Portfolio prioritisation
Score initiatives against strategic objectives, value, risk, capacity. Visual prioritisation matrices. Quarterly reprioritisation cycles. Funded vs. unfunded backlog clearly separated.
Pillar · Projects
Most PMO tooling is a glorified Gantt chart. Argitron treats portfolios, programmes, projects, and tasks as the same first-class object family that incidents, changes, and controls are — so the dependencies and risks aggregate without manual re-keying.
Score initiatives against strategic objectives, value, risk, capacity. Visual prioritisation matrices. Quarterly reprioritisation cycles. Funded vs. unfunded backlog clearly separated.
Initiation / planning / execution / closure gates. Gate criteria configurable per project class. Go/no-go decision recorded with evidence: business case, risk register, security review, AI impact assessment if applicable.
Risks, Assumptions, Issues, Dependencies on every project. Risks promote to programme then to enterprise risk register. Issues escalate via SLA. Dependencies show on a portfolio-wide map.
Skills supply vs. project demand. Resource conflicts visible at portfolio review. Scenarios: "what if we delay X by a quarter?" answered without a spreadsheet.
Cross-project dependencies, technical / architectural couplings, vendor and contract dependencies. Critical-path view across the portfolio.
Project closure isn't the end. Benefits tracked post go-live against the original business case. Lagging measures linked to the strategic objective.
Every IT project produces governance artefacts. Argitron stores them once.
Stage-gate "execute" produces the change records that flow through ITIL change enablement. CAB sees what's coming three sprints out.
DPIAs, threat models, pen tests, training records, change approvals — collected once, attached to A.8.25–A.8.34 controls automatically.
If the project introduces or changes an AI system, ISO 42001 A.6 lifecycle artefacts (impact assessment, data lineage, validation, deployment plan) are part of the stage-gate checklist.
Argitron does not impose a methodology. PMBOK-style knowledge-area governance, PRINCE2 stages with defined roles and tolerances, Scrum / SAFe / Kanban for delivery, or a hybrid model where PRINCE2/PMBOK governs the portfolio and agile teams deliver — all supported on the same data model.
For regulated environments, gate criteria can be locked: no project ships to production without a risk register, an information classification, and (if applicable) an AI impact assessment.
Project risks roll up. Project changes flow through ITIL. Project artefacts feed the auditor's bundle.